Jose Espinoza-Rosales v. Pamela Bondi

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GUADALUPE ESPINOZA- No. 20-71170

ROSALES,

Agency No. A209-805-575 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 19, 2026** Tucson, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Jose Espinoza-Rosales seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen, which he sought to apply for

cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the

petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Espinoza-Rosales’s primary argument—that both we and the immigration

court below lack jurisdiction because the Notice to Appear did not…