Goode

facts sufficient to show that Canedo caused the machine’s removal. See Gibson v.

United States, 781 F.2d 1334, 1338 (9th Cir. 1986) (setting forth the elements of a

§ 1983 claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the medical

24-3448 classification chronology form. See Fed. R. Evid. 901(a) (stating the requirement

for authenticating evidence); Domingo ex rel. Domingo v. T.K., 289 F.3d 600, 605

(9th Cir. 2002) (setting forth standard of review for summary judgment evidentiary

rulings). We reject as unsupported by the record Goode’s contention that Canedo’s

motion for summary judgment was untimely.

Goode’s request for appointment of counsel, set forth in his opening brief, is

denied.

AFFIRMED.

24-3448