Carroll
Carroll v. Corsaro
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KASEY CARROLL, No. 24-7513 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-01348-CDS-EJY Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
S. CORSARO, Police Officer; FAC ECF
#6; AGENT OF THE STATE, Psychologist; EXPERT WITNESS, Agent of the State; Psychologist; D. ALATORRE, Police Officer; FAC ECF #6; JOHN PAOLINI, Psychologist; FAC ECF #6; LIA ROLEY, Psychologist; FAC ECF #6; MARK BRATTIN, Psychologist; FAC ECF #6;
MELINDA STEPHENS, FAC ECF #6;
CHRISTY CRAIG, AC ECF #12; ARLENE
HESHMATI, AC ECF #12; STATE OF
NEVADA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Cristina D. Silva, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.