Bello-Naranjo

Bello-Naranjo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202624-4135California589 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR BELLO-NARANJO, No. 24-4135 Agency No. Petitioner, A240-741-882 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 2, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.***

Edgar Bello-Naranjo petitions for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

1. The BIA did not abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.