Bello-Naranjo
Bello-Naranjo v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202624-4135California589 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDGAR BELLO-NARANJO, No. 24-4135 Agency No. Petitioner, A240-741-882 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 2, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.***
Edgar Bello-Naranjo petitions for review of a decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
1. The BIA did not abuse…