Suzuki

Suzuki v. Marinepolis USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202625-499California994 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAISAKU SUZUKI; KAZUYA OMOTO, No. 25-499 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 2:21-cv-01229-KKE v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARINEPOLIS USA, INC., an Oregon corporation; MARINEPOLIS CO LTD, a Japanese corporation; MITSUYOSHI INOHARA, an individual; ICHIRO MACHIDA, an individual,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Kymberly K. Evanson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 9, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs-Appellants, Daisaku Suzuki and Kazuya Omoto (“Plaintiffs”)

appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to vacate the dismissal of

their lawsuit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.