Sergio Hernandez-Valenzuela v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202620-72739California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SERGIO ALBERTO HERNANDEZ- No. 20-72739

VALENZUELA,

Agency No. A087-545-868 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 19, 2026** Tucson, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Hernandez-Valenzuela petitions for review of a decision of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming a decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

denying Hernandez-Valenzuela’s application for cancellation of removal.

Hernandez-Valenzuela argues that the IJ overlooked evidence that his family would

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). experience exceptional and extremely unusual hardship if he is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.