Anne T. v. Oak CA2/1

BACKGROUND

Oak’s brief is prolix and convoluted, alleging a vast conspiracy against him, and the record he supplies is substantially incomplete. Its omissions include but are not limited to Anne T.’s request for a CHRO, the CHRO itself, the allegedly wrongful January 8, 2024 order, and the reporter’s

1 We refer to Anne T. by her first name and last initial because she is a protected person in a CHRO proceeding. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.90(b)(5).)

2 transcript from the March 20, 2025 hearing where the order he seeks to appeal was denied. Our procedural summary is therefore limited. The court’s docket indicates that on October 4, 2023, Anne T. sought a temporary restraining order against Oak, which the court partially granted. According to Anne T.’s brief on appeal, Oak harassed her and other occupants of a multi-unit condominium building (the Property). His actions included “trying to gain access to the gated . . . [P]roperty, posting purported eviction notices and at one point sending a locksmith to the [Property] to try to change the locks.” Oak contends he or the religious organization known as The Great Mission (of which he is senior pastor) owns the Property and, thus,…