Moreno

United States v. Moreno

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202625-4938California460 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-4938 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:20-cr-00085-AB-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANCO ARMANDO MORENO, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Amy M. Baggio, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Franco Armando Moreno, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Moreno contends the district court procedurally erred by failing to respond

to his argument that the “more punitive” sentence he served for his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.