Solano-Tenorio

Solano-Tenorio v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202623-963California838 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAMON SOLANO-TENORIO, No. 23-963 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-934-623 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 2, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ramon Solano-Tenorio seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) decision upholding an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his

cancellation of removal application and request for voluntary departure. He claims

that the agency erred in concluding that his wife had not established exceptional and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). extremely unusual hardship. He also argues that the agency abused its discretion in

denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.