Rodriguez-Rojas

Rodriguez-Rojas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202621-191California432 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR RODRIGUEZ-ROJAS, No. 21-191 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-809-499 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 19, 2026** Tucson, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Julio Rodriguez-Rojas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from

an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) granting voluntary departure. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

“A decision will be reversed on due process grounds if (1) the proceeding was

so fundamentally unfair that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.