Bondi

Mendoza Velasquez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202625-1584California1,291 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREA MENDOZA VELASQUEZ; No. 25-1584 CARLOS ADOLFO JERONIMO Agency Nos.

MENDOZA; SILVIA MARIALENA A203-630-649

JERONIMO MENDOZA; L.M.J.M., A203-630-651

A203-630-602

Petitioners,

A203-630-650

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, M. SMITH, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge R. Nelson.

Petitioners, Andrea Mendoza Velasquez (“Ms. Mendoza Velasquez”), Carlos

Adolfo Jeronimo Mendoza, Silvia Marialena Jeronimo Mendoza, and Ms. Mendoza

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Velasquez’s minor child…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.