Epicenter Loss Recovery LLC v. Burford Capital Limited

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202624-721California1,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EPICENTER LOSS RECOVERY LLC, No. 24-721 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:18-cv-03300-DJH v.

MEMORANDUM*

BURFORD CAPITAL LIMITED;

GANYMEDE INVESTMENTS LIMITED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2026 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Epicenter Loss Recovery LLC (“Epicenter”) appeals from an order

compelling arbitration and from the dismissal of its suit for lack of subject-matter

jurisdiction after the arbitration proceedings concluded. Defendants are two

foreign entities: Burford Capital Limited (“Burford”) and its wholly owned

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. subsidiary Ganymede Investments Limited (“Ganymede”), against whom

Epicenter asserted various tort and contract claims. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.