Juliar

Juliar v. St. Jude Hospital CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2026G064493California1,330 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scott, J.

FACTS

Plaintiffs sued defendant and a surgeon for the wrongful death of their relative, Helen Juliar. The complaint alleged Juliar died after the surgeon “rupture[d]” Juliar’s artery while inserting a pacemaker at the hospital. It alleged defendants “failed to timely diagnose and/or mismanaged an emergency pericardial tamponade.” Defendant moved for summary judgment based on the expert declaration from Julia Hughes, a nurse and former surgery center nursing director with a master’s degree in healthcare administration. She recounted: “[t]he surgery started at 2133”; “[a]round 2152 . . . a code blue was called”; and “[a]t 2230, an echo was performed, and it was noted that it was consistent with probable tamponade.” Later, “[a]nother echo was performed and showed organized pericardial clots.” Another code was called; Juliar could not be resuscitated and died. Hughes opined: (1) defendant and its staff “met the nursing standard of care in the community”; (2) “[t]he O.R. team ensured that the

1 The first amended complaint, answer, and judgment designated defendant as “St. Jude Hospital.” Some trial court captions designated defendant as “Providence St. Jude Medical Center.” In its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.