Xiomara Segovia Granados v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202621-70269California802 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIOMARA ARELY SEGOVIA No. 21-70269

GRANADOS; V. M. A.-S.,

Agency Nos. A208-751-547 Petitioners, A208-751-548

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 25, 2026**

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Xiomara Arely Segovia Granados (Segovia) and her minor son, natives and

citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) dismissing the appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision

denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.