Ruth Guardado-De Carranza v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202618-70351California647 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUTH ANDREA GUARDADO-DE No. 18-70351

CARRANZA; FRANCISCO ANDRES

CARRANZA-GUARDADO, Agency Nos. A208-164-673

A208-164-674

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submission Deferred December 23, 2025 Re-Submitted March 25, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, BRESS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ruth Andrea Guardado-De Carranza and her minor son, natives

and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (the “Board”) dismissing her appeal of an immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judge’s order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.