Perez

Perez v. Shaouli CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2026B344100MCalifornia3,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff’s August 16, 2023 complaint alleged as follows. Defendants owned Rene’s Bakery in Los Angeles. The Department of Motor Vehicles provided plaintiff with a disability placard due to her “physical impairments.” Within one year prior to filing the complaint, plaintiff, “on at least three different occasions,” attempted to patronize the bakery but encountered a barrier to accessing the establishment in that it did not provide parking designated for customers with disability placards. Plaintiff sought $4,000 in statutory damages “per violation” on each cause of action, attorney fees, and costs of the lawsuit. Defendants did not file an answer. On November 27, 2023, plaintiff filed a request for entry of default and default was entered that same day. On October 29, 2024, the following documents were filed in support of a request for entry of a default judgment. Plaintiff’s counsel filed a declaration and requested $750 in attorney fees. Perez filed a declaration in support of the allegations in the complaint and the

2 entry of default judgment. In her declaration, Perez stated she attempted to patronize the bakery in June, July, and August of 2023 but was prevented…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.