People v. Lugo CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2026F088895California4,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

Harrell, J.

Filed 3/25/26 P. v. Lugo CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F088895

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. MCR075082) v.

RAFAEL SANTIAGO LUGO, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Dale J. Blea, Judge. Joshua L. Siegel, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Kimberley A. Donohue, Assistant Attorney General, Darren K. Indermill and Paul E. O’Connor, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Defendant Rafael Santiago Lugo was convicted by a jury of one count of committing a lewd act on a minor aged 14 or 15 years old in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.