In re C.H. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 2026C104681California2,270 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/26/26 In re C.H. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

In re C.H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court C104681 Law.

SHASTA COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN (Super. Ct. No. SERVICES AGENCY, 24JV-32877-01)

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

M.H.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Father M.H. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his reunification services at the 12-month review hearing. On appeal, father contends the juvenile court did not understand the full scope of its discretion when terminating services and his case must be remanded for the juvenile court to clarify whether he is an alleged or presumed parent. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.