People v. Moore CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2026C103145California1,522 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 3/27/26 P. v. Moore CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama) ----

THE PEOPLE, C103145

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 21CR000071)

v.

KELLY MULLINS MOORE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Kelly Mullins Moore pled guilty to theft-related charges and was sentenced to six years four months in prison. In defendant’s first appeal, this court remanded the case for resentencing after concluding the trial court abused its discretion when it found that dismissing a prior serious felony enhancement would endanger public safety (Pen. Code, § 667, subd. (a); further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code). On remand, the trial court declined to dismiss the enhancement and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.