People v. Maynard CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2026C101665California6,324 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/27/26 P. v. Maynard CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE, C101665

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CR2021-3587)

v.

AZEL SINCLAIR MAYNARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Azel Sinclair Maynard assaulted his brother’s roommate and, after a jury trial, was convicted of five felony counts, including attempted rape and dissuading a witness. He now challenges the legality of those convictions as well as his sentence. We agree that Maynard’s sentence on count 5 should be vacated, although not for the reasons he contends. We otherwise affirm the judgment.

LEGAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

One night in December 2021, Crystal L. was at home with her four-year-old son. Her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.