In re J.V. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2026C103279California2,111 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

I Probation Conditions J.V. contends three of the probation conditions ordered by the juvenile court are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Specifically, he complains these conditions appear to apply immediately but are impossible to comply with while he is confined in the secure youth treatment facility. We are not persuaded. At the disposition hearing, the juvenile court adopted the “[f]indings and [o]rders” attached to the probation report dated January 8, 2025, which were also attached to the court’s January 13, 2025 minute order from the disposition hearing. This document included a number of probation conditions, three of which J.V. challenges on appeal: “19. The minor is ordered not to illegally use or possess any drug, narcotic, marijuana or alcohol, or to associate with persons known to use, possess or traffic in these substances, or to frequent places where he knows they are used unlawfully;” “27. The minor is ordered not to associate with anyone known to the minor to be on probation or parole;” “52. Parent(s)/[g]uardian(s) [are ordered] to participate in counseling with minor, and cooperate fully with the [j]uvenile [c]ourt and the [p]robation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.