William S. Kachele, Jr. v. Jo EL-MAASRI, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA William S. KACHELE, Jr., Case No.: 25-cv-3458-AGS-MMP Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION (ECF 9)

v. Jo EL-MAASRI, et al., Defendants. 8 Self-represented plaintiff William Kachele, Jr., seeks reconsideration of this Court’s prior order denying his request for a temporary restraining order. (See ECF 9, 12.) A motion to reconsider is appropriate only when a court “(1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” School Dist. No. IJ v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). Kachele offers none of these, so his motion is denied. In the original order, this Court noted that “[s]ection 1983 requires, among other things, that any ‘alleged deprivation was committed under color of state law.’” (ECF 7, at 2.) Since Kachele had only pleaded private actions from his landlords, it wasn’t clear how he would…