Noem

A.A. v. Kristi Noem, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20263:26-cv-00397California636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.A., No. 1:26-cv-00302-DAD-JDP Petitioner, v. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE

KRISTI NOEM, et al., SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AND VACATING THE COURT’S JANUARY

Respondents. 19, 2026 ORDER (Doc. Nos. 11, 13) 17 18 On January 15, 2026, petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, a motion for temporary restraining order, and a motion to proceed under a pseudonym. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2, 3.) In that habeas petition, petitioner alleged that venue was proper in this court because petitioner was detained in an immigration detention facility in California City, California, which is within the jurisdiction of the Eastern District of California. (Doc. No. 1 at 4.) On January 19, 2026, the court issued an order granting in part petitioner’s motion for a temporary restraining and motion to proceed by pseudonym. (Doc. No. 11.) That same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.