People v. Petrakis CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2026H051126California3,919 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lie, J.

I. BACKGROUND

The Santa Clara County District Attorney charged Petrakis with second degree robbery (Pen. Code,1 § 212.5, subd. (c); count 1) and threatening to commit a crime resulting in death or great bodily injury (§ 422, subd. (a); count 2). The district attorney

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. also alleged that Petrakis personally used a knife while committing the charged offenses (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)). The evidence introduced at trial was that Petrakis shoplifted razors and insoles at a Grocery Outlet store and, once confronted by the store manager and two other employees in the parking lot, brandished a knife that he threatened to use against the employees to make his escape. Police apprehended Petrakis near the store and recovered the stolen merchandise and a knife. A. Faretta Requests

The public defender represented Petrakis throughout the proceedings, despite Petrakis’s four requests to substitute counsel under People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden). Petrakis first moved to represent himself on January 3, 2023, about two months before trial.2 Petrakis completed a written Faretta waiver and told the trial court that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.