People v. Hummel CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2026C102903California6,200 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/30/26 P. v. Hummel CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C102903

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 24CF04518)

v.

VANYA ERICSON HUMMEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Vanya Ericson Hummel pleaded no contest to a charge of making criminal threats and the court sentenced him to an upper term of three years. Hummel does not contest his guilt but raises several challenges to his sentence. We affirm the judgment, but because we agree that Hummel did not validly waive his right to a jury trial on the aggravating sentencing factors and those factors were not properly proven, we vacate the sentence and remand the cause for a new sentencing hearing.

PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.