People v. Fite CA2/6
Opinion
Opinion
Baltodano, J.
Filed 3/30/26 P. v. Fite CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B341788 (Super. Ct. No. 23F-08282) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County)
v.
TANNER WILLIAMDEAN
FITE,
Defendant and Appellant.
Tanner Williamdean Fite appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of four counts of lewd acts on a child (Pen. Code,1 § 288, subd. (a)). The court sentenced Fite to five years in state prison. Fite contends the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted the titles of pornographic videos on his phone, the evidence did not support the aggravating circumstance of violent
1 All undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. conduct indicating a…