Rubin

Rubin v. Douglas Elliman of Cal. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2026B341122California7,898 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bendix, J.

Filed 3/30/26 Rubin v. Douglas Elliman of Cal. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STANFORD K. RUBIN et al., B341122

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22SMCV00454) v.

DOUGLAS ELLIMAN OF

CALIFORNIA, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark H. Epstein, Judge. Affirmed. Sklar Kirsh, Jerry L. Kay and Loren N. Cohen for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Manning & Kass Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester, Ari L. Markow and Mark R. Wilson for Defendant and Respondent. ____________________________ This is an appeal from the sustaining of a demurrer and grant of summary judgment in favor of Douglas Elliman of California, Inc. (Elliman).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.