Online Carstereo.com v. Behrooz Meimand Ins. CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2013B243365California4,873 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/9/13 Online Carstereo.com v. Behrooz Meimand Ins. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ONLINE CARSTEREO.COM, B243365

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC455183) v.

BEHROOZ MEIMAND INSURANCE

SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Amy D. Hogue, Judge. Affirmed.

Musick, Peeler & Garrett, David A. Tartaglio, Cheryl A. Orr; Collins Collins Muir + Stewart, David E. Barker and Ryan J. Kohler for Defendant and Appellant.

Carlsen Law Corporation and Miles Carlsen for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________ An insured sued its insurance broker for breach of an oral or implied contract,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.