People v. Brown CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing, at great length, the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presented no argument for reversal, but asks this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

(Wende). Under Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), she listed numerous

possible, but not arguable issues. We summarize the lengthy assortment of "possible

issues" as follows:

1. Did the trial court properly allow Brown to represent herself at the revocation

hearing?

2. Was Brown afforded her trial rights at the revocation hearing?

3. Did the court properly deny Brown's request to call the prosecutors and their

investigator to testify at the hearing?

4. Was the evidence sufficient to support the decision to revoke probation?

5. Did the court properly extend the period of probation when it reinstated Brown

to probation?

6. Did the court correctly select count 76 as the principal term in the calculation

of the suspended prison sentence?

7. Are separate sentences authorized for rent skimming under Civil Code sections

890 and 892?

8. Did the trial court properly impose full term consecutive…