McKinney

McKinney v. Morris CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2013B240830California12,487 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

Filed 10/15/13 McKinney v. Morris CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

JOYCE MCKINNEY, B240830

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC095322) v.

ERROL MORRIS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. James Steele, Judge. Affirmed.

The Tidrick Law Firm, Steven G. Tidrick, and Andrew L. Younkins for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sedgwick, Gail E. Kavanagh, John F. Stephens, and Chantal Z. Hwang for Defendants and Respondents.

********** In 1977, a tabloid media frenzy erupted in England over the arrest of plaintiff and appellant Joyce McKinney, an American former beauty pageant contestant, on charges she had kidnapped Kirk…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.