Mansour-White

Mansour-White v. Grant & Weber CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2013B239900California2,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/15/13 Mansour-White v. Grant & Weber CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

NATALIE MANSOUR-WHITE et al., B239900

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC435412) v.

GRANT & WEBER, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Malcolm H. Mackey, Judge. Reversed.

Dix and Associates and Lloyd D. Dix for Defendant and Appellant.

The Law Office of Jay W. Smith and Jay W. Smith for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

______________________ Grant & Weber, Inc. (Grant & Weber) brought a debt collection action against Natalie Mansour-White (Natalie) and Robert White (Robert; collectively the Whites). Upon learning that the debt had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.