People v. Hall CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2013B244814California961 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Charles Shane Hall appeals from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a negotiated plea of no contest. Hall challenges the order that he “[o]bey the protective order issued in this or any other case.” He also argues that the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the award of presentence custody credits. We agree with Hall, affirm the judgment as modified, and remand with directions to modify the abstract of judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Hall was charged in an information with two counts of making a criminal threat (Pen. Code, § 422)1 against Nancy Correas, the mother of his children. As to both counts, the information specially alleged that Hall had suffered two prior serious or violent felony convictions within the meaning of section 667, subdivision (a)(1), and the “Three Strikes” law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) and had served a separate prison term for a felony (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). Represented by counsel, Hall pleaded not guilty and denied the special allegations. Pursuant to a negotiated agreement, Hall pleaded no contest to one count of making a criminal threat and admitted one prior strike conviction. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.