People v. Kelly CA5

FACTS

It was alleged in count 1 of the complaint, to which appellant pleaded no contest, that “on or about between March 12, 2012 and March 13, 2012, [appellant] … willfully and unlawfully enter[ed] a building belonging to Norman Etchison Custom Harvesting, with the intent to commit larceny or any felony ….” (Unnecessary capitalization omitted.)2

DISCUSSION

Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

No preliminary hearing was conducted and the abbreviated probation officer’s report did not contain a summary of the facts of the instant offense.

3