Latty

Latty v. Croslin CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 2013A134240California2,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 10/11/13 Latty v. Croslin CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DARLENE L. LATTY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. A134240 WILLIAM J. CROSSLIN, (Contra Costa County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. P07-01131)

This is an appeal from a decision to grant the petition of respondents Darlene L. Latty and Rebecca Kinsfather (by and through her guardian ad litem, Lythan Gage) for reformation of The Rufus T. Crosslin and Mary L. Crosslin Irrevocable Family Trust (trust), and to deny the petition of appellant William J. Crosslin to enforce a settlement agreement related to the trust that he entered into with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.