In re Sophia S. CA2/5

I. INTRODUCTION

The father, Robert S., appeals from the juvenile court’s December 14, 2012 order continuing jurisdiction at the Welfare and Institutions Code section 364 review hearing.1 He argues there is insufficient evidence for continued supervision under section 364 because the children, Sophia and Angelica S., were not at risk of sexual abuse. We affirm the juvenile court’s order to continue jurisdiction over the two children.

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 7, 2011, the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services (the department) filed a section 300 petition on behalf of Sophia and Angelica, aged 15 and 14 respectively. The petition was filed pursuant to section 300, subdivisions (b) and (d). The petition alleges the father possessed 50 videos and hundreds of images of child pornography on his home computer in August 2011. At the September 7, 2011 detention hearing, the children were detained. The juvenile court released the children to the mother and required the father to move out of the family home. The father was granted monitored visits, at least three times a week. The parents were ordered to attend individual counseling. At the October 27, 2011…