Benton

Benton v. Telecom Network Specialists, Inc.

Bad Law
163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 415·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 828·220 Cal. App. 4th 701·2013 WL 5631982
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2013B242441California12,163 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs filed a wage and hour class action lawsuit against Telecom Network Specialists, Inc. (TNS), alleging, among other things, violation of meal and rest break requirements and failure to pay overtime. The proposed class consisted of approximately 750 cell phone tower technicians, most of whom were hired and paid by staffing companies that contracted with TNS. The remainder of the technicians—approximately 15 percent of the proposed class—were hired and paid by TNS directly. Plaintiffs alleged that TNS was the employer of both categories of technicians and moved to certify their claims.

The trial court denied the motion, concluding that, even if it assumed TNS was the employer of every class member, plaintiffs could not establish TNS’s liability through common proof because (1) the technicians worked under “a diversity of workplace conditions” that enabled some of them to take meal and rest breaks, and (2) the staffing companies that hired and paid many of the TNS technicians had adopted different meal, rest break and overtime policies throughout the class period. We reverse the order and remand for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.