Nisevic

Nisevic v. City of Los Angeles CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2013B244910California2,449 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

Filed 10/16/13 Nisevic v. City of Los Angeles CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

SINISHA NISEVIC, B244910

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC111319) v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Craig D. Karlan, Judge. Affirmed. Carmen A. Trutanich, City Attorney, Timothy McWilliams, Supervising Attorney, and Peter E. Langsfeld, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of John E. Torbett, Jr., John E. Torbett, Jr.; Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Michael M. Berger and Benjamin G. Shatz for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________________ Defendant City of Los…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.