Su Ou v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
542 F. App'x 591
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 201317-56297California279 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Shiwen Ou, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for asylum. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s adverse credibility determination because numerous inconsistencies existed between Ou’s application, his brother’s testimony and separate asylum application, including discrepancies between them household registers. See Kaur v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1061, 1066-67 (9th Cir. 2005) (numerous inconsistencies cast doubt on a petitioner’s story by creating an “indication of dishonesty”); Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 939-40 (9th Cir.2000) (adverse credibility finding supported where inconsistencies between testimony and application went to the heart of the claim).

We lack jurisdiction to consider both Ou’s due process claim and his argument that the IJ erred in finding he filed a frivolous asylum application, because Ou failed to raise these claims in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.