People v. Tygenhof CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2013C072039California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/18/13 P. v. Tygenhof CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C072039

v. (Super. Ct. No. P09CRF0256)

RYAN RAYMOND TYGENHOF,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Ryan Raymond Tygenhof asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error, we affirm the judgment. Defendant pled no contest to child endangerment. (Pen. Code,1 § 273a, subd. (a).) A count of lewd and lascivious acts with a child (§ 288, subd. (a)) and an allegation of substantial sexual conduct (§ 1203.066, subd. (a)(8)) were dismissed in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.