People v. McGivens CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, counsel asks this court to review the

record for error. Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, the brief identifies possible,

but not arguable issues:

1. Was McGivens's plea constitutionally valid?

2. Was McGivens properly granted leave to represent himself in the trial court?

We have reviewed the entire record in accordance with Wende, supra, 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, and have not found any reasonably arguable

appellate issues. McGivens has been represented by competent counsel on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

AARON, J.

3