People v. Garnica CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 21, 2013C072017California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/21/13 P. v. Garnica CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C072017

v. (Super. Ct. No. NCR82220)

RICHARD DANIEL GARNICA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Richard Daniel Garnica asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error, we affirm the judgment. An information charged defendant with mayhem (count 1; Pen. Code1, § 203), corporal injury to a former cohabitant (count 2; § 273.5, subd. (a)), and assault with a deadly weapon (counts 3-5; § 245, subd. (a)(1)). As to counts 1 and 2, it was alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.