Lewis
Lewis v. Wren CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Robert R. Lewis and Linda Lewis appeal from the dismissal of their
action against defendants and respondents Chris Wren, Nancy Wren, Stocker &
Lancaster, LLP, and Jay F. Stocker for negligent infliction of emotional distress and
malicious prosecution following the trial court‟s granting of defendants‟ special motion
to strike (anti-SLAPP1 motion) under Code of Civil Procedure2 section 425.16. The
Lewises contend they made a prima facie showing of facts to sustain a favorable
judgment, and the trial court therefore erred in granting the special motion to strike. The
Lewises also contend the trial court erred in ruling on the admissibility of evidence. We
affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Background
On March 7, 2002, the Wrens and the Lewises entered into an agreement by which
the Wrens agreed to purchase residential property (the property) from the Lewises for
$350,000. Escrow on the sale of the property closed on June 4, 2002.
Before June 2000, the Lewises had been involved in a dispute with Cox PCS
Assets, LLC, (Cox) and Sprint (collectively referred to herein as Sprint)3 regarding the
1 The acronym SLAPP stands for…