Grimm

Grimm v. Capital One CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2013D063079California5,997 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 10/22/13 Grimm v. Capital One CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RAY GRIMM, JR. et al., D063079

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00098599-

CU-OR-CTL)

CAPITAL ONE, N.A.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald S.

Prager, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Ronald H. Freshman and Ronald H. Freshman for Plaintiffs and

Appellants.

Doll Amir & Eley and Hunter R. Eley, William H. Edmonson for Defendant and

Respondent Capital One, N.A.

The Dreyfuss Firm and Lawrence J. Dreyfuss for Defendants and Respondents

T.D. Service Company. Plaintiffs and appellants Ray Grimm and Daran Grimm, husband and wife,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.