Bushnell

Bushell v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 539·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 841·220 Cal. App. 4th 915·2013 WL 5723074
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2013C070643California5,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

Butz, J.

In this action arising from a home foreclosure, the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, defendant lender’s demurrer to plaintiff borrowers’ complaint. The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and fraud based on intentional misrepresentation or false promise. Specifically, plaintiffs allege that defendant, under a trial modification mortgage plan, offered to permanently modify plaintiffs’ mortgage loan, provided plaintiffs complied with the terms of the trial modification plan by returning certain requested documents, making timely trial modification payments, and qualifying under a federal program that seeks to reduce home foreclosures, the Home Affordable Modification Program (hereafter, HAMP).

Two recent appellate decisions provide guidance on this subject, one from the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three (West v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 780 [ 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 285 ] (West)) and the other from the federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (7th Cir. 2012) 673 F.3d 547 (Wigod)). These two decisions, which were issued after the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.