United States v. Steve Kinsella

Good Law
543 F. App'x 623
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 201312-50422California333 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50422

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-01183-DSF

v.

MEMORANDUM *

STEVE MICHAEL KINSELLA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2013 **

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Steve Michael Kinsella appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 188-month sentence for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Kinsella’s counsel has filed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a brief stating that there are no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.