United States v. Steve Kinsella
543 F. App'x 623
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 201312-50422California333 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 22 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50422
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-01183-DSF
v.
MEMORANDUM *
STEVE MICHAEL KINSELLA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2013 **
Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Steve Michael Kinsella appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 188-month sentence for conspiracy to
possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Kinsella’s counsel has filed
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a brief stating that there are no…