United States v. Ramiro Lopez-Diaz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 201312-10591California233 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 22 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10591
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01516-RCC
v.
MEMORANDUM *
RAMIRO LOPEZ-DIAZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2013 **
Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Ramiro Lopez-Diaz appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 12-month sentence imposed
upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Lopez-Diaz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have…