United States v. Ramiro Lopez-Diaz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 201312-10591California233 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10591

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01516-RCC

v.

MEMORANDUM *

RAMIRO LOPEZ-DIAZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2013 **

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ramiro Lopez-Diaz appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 12-month sentence imposed

upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Lopez-Diaz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.