United States v. Maximiliano Mendez-Baltazar

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 201312-10582California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 12-10582 12-10583 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:12-cr-50133-SMM v. 2:12-cr-01510-SMM

MAXIMILIANO MENDEZ-BALTAZAR,

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2013 **

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Maximiliano Mendez-Baltazar appeals his

guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and

consecutive 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.