Mave Enterprises v. Travelers Indemnity etc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 2013B241807MCalifornia14,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/23/13 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

MAVE ENTERPRISES, INC., B241807

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC086852) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the majority opinion filed herein and certified for publication in the Official Reports on September 26, 2013, be modified as follows: To the paragraph commencing at the bottom of page 31 with ―Shahinian also noted that the Court of Appeal‖ and continuing on page 32, insert on page 32 the following quotation and citation between the citation to footnote 16 of Shahinian and the sentence that begins ―Private arbitration . . . really is private‖: ―If the limited state involvement of converting [an arbitration] award into a judgment were to engender the same due process incidents required with respect to [a judgment] originally assessed and imposed by a court, the contrasting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.