Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines v. Union Pacific CA2/8
Opinion
Opinion
Flier, J.
Filed 10/23/13 Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines v. Union Pacific CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, INC., B244361
et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BS136153)
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, James R. Dunn, Judge. Reversed.
Mayer Brown, Donald Falk, Neil M. Soltman and Michael F. Kerr for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
McKenna Long & Aldridge, Thomas F. Winfield III and Michael H. Wallenstein for Defendant and Respondent.
****** “It is now settled that a party is entitled to attorney fees under [Civil Code] section 1717 ‘even when the party prevails on…