People v. Walker CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 2013C073231California376 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Defendant argues his prior conviction for battery with serious bodily injury does not qualify as a strike offense. Defendant is wrong. The People alleged defendant’s prior conviction for battery with serious bodily injury was a prior strike conviction under section 1192.7, subdivision (c)(8). The bare fact of that conviction, however, is not sufficient to establish the crime was a strike offense. (People v. Bueno (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1503, 1508 (Bueno).) “[O]ne can commit a battery within the meaning of section 243, subdivision (d) without committing a serious felony within the meaning of section 1192.7, subdivision (c)(8).” (Ibid.) Here, in order to establish defendant’s prior conviction for battery was a serious felony, the prosecution was required to prove defendant “personally inflicted the injury, rather than that he aided and abetted another [citation], and that the victim was not an accomplice.” (Bueno, supra, at p. 1508.) Alternately, defendant could admit the prior conviction for battery was a strike offense. (Ibid.) Here, defendant admitted the prior strike as part of the plea. Accordingly, there was no error. Defendant contends it was error to enhance his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.